Lsu4.9 tps signal fail, leanout problem? super strange

hey guys. yesterday i take my car for a spin. i calibrated the lsu4.9 circuit first, car rans fine for about 35minutes. after a 5min stop at the gas station i drove and car startet leaning out. i first thought it was the lsu4.9 problem again so i unplugged the lsu, and car drove fine again. as the mapping is already 99% i was fine with it.

at home i checked the log, and it seems like at the moment the leanouts started, my throttle signal was 0% all the time. the moment i unplugged the lsu4.9 my throttle signal was back again and i could drive the rest of the night.

timestamp 35:00 car starts jumping and leanout happening up to min 44:00 where i unplugged the lambda sensor. and everything was back to normal

any idea what this could be?
20240727_0836.emublog3 (6.7 MB)
beste.emub3 (59.1 KB)

In the log not just ur TPS also ur PPS is 0 permananetly starting at some point. At this time ur engine stuck in idle…u then drove the car with fixed ignition angle 6°. Later u are fast switching between idle and overrun…there ur engine leans out. This can all be explained by PPS/TPS issues (although i would expect to see something else than 0 in those channels at this point).
After unplugging lambda ur TPS came back…but still looks partially corrupted.
Anyhow…i think u have an electrical issue with TPS/PPS…check ur wiring and find it and all will be good again.

its cable driven, so i dont need pps.
the wiring is the same as the last 5 years and its all good. with lsu4.2 i dont have any issues.
i changed the lambda to lsu4.9 yesterday morning.

If your EMU revision is lower than O, you need to add 150K resistor for reliable LSU 4.9 support.

image

But will this cause a tps problem as well?

The TPS looks really strange. It looks like the voltage is at proper value for 0% and fluctuate a little, but looking at RPM it looks that the throttle is fully open.
However I cannot find any connection between WBO and TPS.

i have a second tps poti here to test. maybe it died on heat

that would explains the problem