Economy when cruising a performance car

With ever increasing fuel prices and more strict emissions regulations, could it be interesting for EMUs to incorporate some optional fuel saving strategies?

I know I’d like to be able to go cruising without breaking the bank, and without compromising performance when it matters.

Dynamic Skip Fire seems like a particularly well-suited strategy for this. The ECU decides whether to cut spark and fuel to whichever cylinder is set to fire next; based on engine harmonics, load, optimal cylinder pressure, optimal throttle angle, EGT, etc.
DSF generally leads to 7-15% reduced fuel consumption and emissions on production vehicles already built for efficiency.
The primary reason for this increased efficiency, is reduction of “active” engine displacement in conditions where full power isn’t required. This in turn reduces pumping losses in the throttle body which is normally almost shut at low load.

On our vehicles built for power, with throttle bodies, combustion chambers or turbos which are massively oversized for cruising and “low-load” conditions; efficiency gains with DSF may be quite a lot higher than for ordinary road vehicles. No performance is sacrificed (in theory), because the DSF algorithm instantly scales “active” engine displacement in response to requested torque. At WOT the ECU requests ignition for 100% of regularly possible ignition events.

I’ve seen in docs that DSF works for V8, V6, straight-6, straight-4 and straight-3. It might work for other configurations as well. Efficiency gain increases with the number of cylinders. Getting harmonics and balance right is a matter of finding an appropriate algorithm.

The technique works for both gasoline and diesel engines.
One major caveat is that DSF basically requires individually deactivatable intake+exhaust valves (like MIVEC-MD, FreeValve, ACT, etc). There are aftermarket options to convert regular OHV and OHC (with rocker arms, mind you) valvetrains to get this function.

ps. EMU support for FreeValve-like systems would also be neat, as that would let engine builders delete camshafts and get complete control of valves as well :slight_smile:

Some related reading:

1 https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/car-technology/a22654294/tula-dynamic-skip-fire-dsf-engine-cylinder-deactivation/
2 Combustion Engine - Tula Technology

3 https://www.tulatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2016-01-0672_fuel_economy_gains_through_dynamic-skip-fire_in_spark_ignition_engines.pdf
4 https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15156796/2019-chevy-gmc-trucks-get-smarter-fuel-saving-cylinder-deactivation/

5 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350038192_Overview_on_the_Cylinder_Deactivation_techniques
6 https://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/products/engine-solutions/valve-and-valve-actuation/srff-elatch-actuation.html

7 chevrolet - How does cylinder deactivation work? - Motor Vehicle Maintenance & Repair Stack Exchange
8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9KJ_f7REGw

Dynamic skip fire is nothing more than an advanced cylinder deactivation by SW. U already can do this with EMU pro and the per cylinder trim.
But wont bring u much benefit, cause u loose lambda control by deactivating a cylinder by turning off the injection (except for V engine). Thats the general problem of cylinder deactivation by SW only and also the reason no OEM is doing this. In addition…u still have the pumping looses.
A real Cylinder deactivation needs to hold the valves closed. Audi for example has a system for this in some cars.
But in general there are way too less engines on the market with such a hardware feature…and it is kind of impossible for a tuner to build such a system on his own.
Thats why in my opinion DSF in first place sounds good…but looking closer it is just big effort for little outcome.

why not just simply write it leaner in the sailing rpms like 2500-2800 under small load numbers? you can easy go lambda 1.1-1.2, saves 10-20% fuel