If you experience communication issues with the device, please restart your computer. We have noticed that these problems are caused by the Windows USB driver. We are working on reproducing and resolving this issue.
Change log:
BOOST: Boost target tables switch mode added (Blend or switch)
FUELCUT: Over RPM fuel cut has higher priority than a Blip.
PADDLE SHIFT: Paddle up properly support number of gears defined in Gearbox parameters
PADDLE SHIFT: Max RPM for 1st, neutral and reverse gears maximum value increased
PADDLE SHIFT: Max VSS for 1st, neutral and reverse gears maximum value increased
USER FUNCTION: Error with displaying values for channels with multiplier > 1 (like GPS Speed)
CANBUS: Fiat Grande Punto - fix for Cruise control switches
CANBUS: Lancer Evo X Differential mode added (Rotary switch CAN 1)
IDLE: Idle control could be activated by Function or PPS
IDLE: Ignition target and max ignition advance table range increase
BARO: Fixed bug when internal MAP was used as a BARO and MAP sensor was assigned to another input
LOG: Internal MAP sensor voltage log channel added
LOG: Fixed Lambda 1 and Lambda 2 gauge
LOG: Acc enrichment correction chanlle added (the current value from correction table)
check your idle settings. there is an acrivatuon condition based on MAP.
Probably idle are deactivated and engine stalls.
However you pressure on idle is really low
After updating from 3.032 to 3.035 the car runs significantly leaner. STFT added 18% fuel once the O2 sensor kicked in. I briefly tried it on 3.034 and 3.033 and both had the same issue. Injector PW, injector cal, and VE all look the same between versions.
I noticed in the 3.033 update that there were changes made to the “fuel rail model”. Is this likely to significantly impact the VE table of a baro referenced fuel system with no fuel pressure sensor?
I simply want to gauge if there is an underlying issue before I re-build the VE table to compensate for this new fuelling. Any help is appreciated.
i am still missing MAP percentage torque reduction multiplier !!
sport - gearshifts - torque reduction- upshift
in V2 we have MAP value coresponding amount of torque reduction needed.
now we dont have any table to calbrate how much torque reduction we need ??!!!
can we get a table for that ? or a canbus analoge input value for percentage of torque reduction we want ? i rather do it in emu then in gearbox controller but. what ever. i need such table
we have now torque reduction depending on what gear thats stupid table i can not use that i have between 100 and 700NM i need to determin the amount of torque reduction by the amount of power or boost i am making during shift please change this axis to map or selectable !
The gearshift strategy is for dog boxes.
I can add an option (where you select external controller for gear shift parameters), that the torque reduction will be read from the CAN BUS using user can stream (I add additional channel to log).
I’ve tested you base map on 3.032 and 3.035 on both versions I get the same PW at given parameters.
What I suggest is to warm up the engine and make a log with 3.032 and then upgrade to 3.035 and make similar log.
Then I will try to find out the differences.
I’ve grabbed a log of this with the engine fully warmed up. The first part of the log is on version 3.032. The second part is on 3.035 (Note: The motor stalled early on in the 35 log, so I reduced the idle min map to 0).
I let the car sit for similar periods to time before each log, to replicate the level of heat soak - which is near identical as you can see with the IAT between logs. Even at the end of both logs, the IAT is at about 12c, and yet the 3.032 version runs with about -2-3% STFT, while 3.035 requires about +5-8% STFT. Even visually, throughout the log you can see that 3.035 is requiring significantly more fuel trim to remain on target.
Let me know if you spot anything! Log and map below. Cheers!
With 35 u seem to have a -9% correction by fuelpressure…with 32 not…there ur settings seem to be different. I think this explains the different fuel trim.
Hello,
I find an issue - not sure if it affect only v3.035 or also olred versions.
after some changes in functions “Fn x”, I save the project and then comparing the project with function “Compare current project…” → My changes in Functions are not mentioned.
also in tab “tables”, there is always mentioned “Custom corr.1” → 0 changes.
